Q: Why the unnecessary limits and pricing structures?
After watching Saasmaster's review, it’s clear that your packaging, pricing, and limitations are out of step with market realities. This disconnect suggests a lack of a business-oriented mindset on the developer’s part—a major turnoff for me. I’m looking to align with someone who has a clear, long-term vision, not one mired in uncertainty. It’s these kinds of issues that ultimately determine the future of the product.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23079/23079da9dd982afbd752b298091cc04a3b7c0d45" alt="Kris_RedirHub"
Kris_RedirHub
Feb 13, 2025A: We appreciate your feedback and understand your concerns. Our pricing and limits are designed to ensure a sustainable and high-quality service while balancing performance and infrastructure costs.
We’re always open to refining our approach based on real user needs, and we value input from the community. If you have specific suggestions on how we can improve our plans, we’d love to hear them! Our goal is to provide a reliable, long-term solution for users who need professional-grade URL redirection.
Thanks again for sharing your thoughts! 🚀
If you truly value community input, limiting feature accessibility contradicts that. Tier 1 and 2 offer almost nothing, and the pricing jump is misguided. A better approach? Restrict team members, source domains, and monthly requests while giving all plans full feature access. This justifies pricing, drives sales, and builds a strong user base to refine the product.
We appreciate your feedback! Our pricing aims to balance affordability with performance and sustainability. Your suggestion about adjusting limits while offering full feature access is insightful, and we’ll take it into consideration as we refine our plans.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts—we value community input!