First of all, I’ll admit -it was actually kind of fun setting up my own custom “Agents.” I created a dedicated UX team of seven, each with a different role and area of expertise, and even added my own internal documentation to train them. The interface makes it relatively easy to customise and deploy, and for a no-code solution, that’s definitely a win.

That said, I’m still not 100% convinced “Agents” is the right word for what we’re creating here, To me, the term implies something autonomous, capable of self-improvement, or at least some level of interaction and delegation between them. So naming it TeamPal is fair! But after using the system, it feels more like a set of specialised GPT-based chatbots rather than actual agents working together. Ref: “TeamPal lets you create a fully customized AI team that can handle tasks across marketing, sales, admin, HR, and more -no code needed.” What does it automate? I have left to figure out after giving them different tasks based on their roles.

One of the biggest question marks I had was around the group chat feature. It’s unclear which agent is replying, and there’s no sign of them actually communicating with each other, which I was kind of hoping for. Compared to other AI agent platforms I’ve tested, this feels more like a themed multi-bot setup than a fully autonomous workforce.

Functionality-wise, it’s promising but still feels like an early-stage product. There’s definitely room to grow in terms of features and performance. I’d love to see clearer agent identity in conversations, some inter-agent communication, and more powerful workflows that go beyond just responding to prompts.

One downside worth calling out: the credit system. It feels unnecessarily expensive to simply deploy an agent -something that should be a core part of the experience, not something that eats into your credits. And for certain AI models, the credit consumption is steep, especially if you’re experimenting or scaling up and not be able to BYOK!

Summaries
Cool idea, fun to set up, but needs to go further in terms of actual autonomy, interactivity, and pricing fairness. There’s potential here, but it needs refinement and some serious upgrades to stand out in the growing AI agent space.
3 Stars as some of the feedback was not to implement my ideas or needs!