WPAutoBlog Reviews

I kind of agree with Markus and wonder why @Hendrik tried to parry the observations and construe it as being unique to German content. The English content are not much better and the images generated are not very desirable. I wish they had a feature to allow you specify the specific image to use from a link or a much easier way to swap images that don't relate much to the content - this is one of the most annoying things and the most reason I barely used the T4 which I bought and regret stacking so much. They should jump over to the competition and borrow some ideas. See what Blogify and the others are up to and bring more features to WPAutoblog. I do not think the product is evolving either as you would expect a product that did sometime on Appsumo to do. What is the roadmap and why is the product evolution stuck in ice? Notwithstanding a good price point, an immature and static product is no good! Need I ask if I could refund my T4.

EDIT April 24th 2025: Hendrik reached out to me and offered me Tier 3 access for my bad experience. He also asked for my support and to remove this review. I declined the offer but agreed to add to my review that I used the tool for German text. Now you know.

April 22nd 2025: I can compare WPAutoBlog to different other blogging apps and will provide my experience. I took the refund as this tool doesn't match the quality I am looking for.

First of all, it is very easy to use. You can enter a seed keyword and check the list of related keywords for any interesting keyword with low competition. I don't know how accurate these ratings are or where the data comes from.

From there you take the short list full of keywords directly to the editor, which will create one article per keyword. Set up some details like add/leave FAQ, images and other stuff. Hit "generate" and come back a few minutes later or auto-schedule them to your Wordpress website.

I did check the quality first and found it insufficient. For example, I created an article for "five finger feedback", but it hardly wrote about what each finger stands for. Any human would've easily seen that each finger and the explanation to that would make a great H3, but the AI decided to cramp the core of the whole idea into two paragraphs and write a lot of broader context around it. It would take very long to fix this article manually.

In another try, I generated an article about "Eustress & Distress: Is good stress a thing?". This article was okayish. Some facts were wrong, and it generated eight key takeaways, which need to be shortened. Unfortunately, it seems WPAutoblog does not create any intro at all (or it is the writing style I chose). It starts directly with answering the question right after the H1, so there is no point in continuing to read and no storytelling at all.

To sum it up, this might be okay for broad topics or blogs which are okay with either poor quality or some rework on each article. But again, this would counter the ease-of-use argument. I, for my part, stick to other software for auto-generating blog articles at the moment.

I have been trialling this product tentatively on one of my site for a number of months now and am thoroughly impressed. It’s not perfect, but for the price it’s great value for money and fulfils a requirement.

The tool is amazing, makes the whole process of blog posting a breeze. The customer service is quick, helpful and extremely considerate. Don't hesitate to buy this, I only wish I'd found it sooner!

Definitely, here is a review of WPAutoBlog in the style you requested:
WPAutoBlog Review: A Powerful Tool for Quick and Basic Content Creation
After intensive use of WPAutoBlog, I can confidently say that the system provides an excellent solution for basic automated content creation needs. The interface is user-friendly and intuitive, and you can start creating basic blog posts quickly and easily. The system especially excels at creating standard and simple content, and is very suitable for cases where a large amount of basic content is required.
However, when it comes to more complex requirements, the system begins to show its limitations. I tried using custom instructions to create more complex content, but without success. The system was unable to comply with the instructions provided, and posts that did not meet the requirements were created. I tried changing the instructions in various ways, but the results did not improve.
In addition, I was disappointed with the customer support. The responses I received were short and generic, and I did not receive any real assistance in solving the problems I encountered. The only suggestion I received was to purchase another product from the company.
In conclusion, WPAutoBlog is a great tool for basic, quick content creation. However, if you need a tool that can handle more complex requirements, you may need to look elsewhere.